Work-Comp board to consider withdrawing lawsuit opposing $30M tr - KXLH.com | Helena, Montana

Work-Comp board to consider withdrawing lawsuit opposing $30M transfer

Posted: Updated:
The Montana state work-comp fund's Helena HQ The Montana state work-comp fund's Helena HQ

Less than two weeks after filing suit to block a $30 million transfer of its funds to help balance the state budget, the state workers’ compensation fund board may vote to withdraw the lawsuit.

The Montana State Fund’s board of directors has scheduled an emergency meeting this Wednesday, to consider whether it should withdraw the suit filed Nov. 17 in state District Court.

The seven-member board that oversees the quasi-governmental insurance fund also now includes two new members appointed Nov. 17 by Gov. Steve Bullock – who proposed the $30 million transfer and last Friday signed into law the bill authorizing it.

Rep. Greg Hertz, R-Polson – an opponent of the transfer – told MTN News Monday that the governor’s office has been pushing the State Fund board to reverse course on the lawsuit.

“The governor is being very transparent,” Hertz said. “He’s actually put two individuals on the board who will do his bidding and his staff has been talking to other board members, and they’re working hard to reverse the board’s decision and withdraw the lawsuit.”

Bullock appointed the new State Fund board members – former state Sen. Cliff Larsen of Missoula and attorney Jim Molloy of Helena, a former adviser to Bullock – on the same day that the lawsuit was filed.

Larsen and Molloy replaced two board members who had voted Nov. 10 to authorize the State Fund to oppose the $30 million transfer.

Bullock spokeswoman Ronja Abel confirmed Monday that the governor's office’s has been contacting State Fund board members about "our concerns about the lawsuit," and the governor later told reporters that he thinks the lawsuit shouldn't go forward. 

“I don’t know that it’s the most productive way, when the Legislature’s passed this (law authorizing the transfer), for the State Fund to be suing the state of Montana," Bullock said. "I think what they ought to do is follow the law that the Legislature passed.”

"The governor and the Legislature worked hard to find responsible solutions to address Montana's budget shortfall and minimize the impact on Montanans," she said. "We have concerns about a state entity trying to undermine those efforts and defy the will of the Legislature."

State Fund board Chairman Lance Zanto, a worker’s compensation administrator for the state, did not return a message Monday.

The State Fund writes work-comp insurance for 26,000 businesses in Montana, insuring them against on-the-job injuries.

Two weeks ago, the state Legislature approved a package of bills to fill a $227 million hole in the state budget.

Among the measures was Senate Bill 4, which imposes a one-time fee on the work-comp fund’s reserves invested with the state Board of Investments. The fee amounts to nearly $30 million over the next two years and will be transferred to the state treasury to shore up the state budget.

At its Nov. 10 meeting, the State Fund board of directors opposed by the bill and authorized fund officials to take legal steps to stop any transfer of funds.

The lawsuit filed by the State Fund Nov. 17 said state law and the state constitution essentially forbids using work-fund funds for any purpose other than paying claims and costs associated with work-comp insurance, because the money is paid by policyholders.

Supporters of the transfer have argued it’s a one-time charge that will not hurt the financial position of the State Fund.

Business groups generally opposed SB4 earlier this month, saying that work-comp funds should not be used to balance the state budget, and should be reserved only for the benefit of policyholders and injured workers.

Hertz said Monday there’s no guarantee the State Fund won’t need that money in the future. Unforeseen events, such as court rulings or a “major correction” by the stock market, could greatly reduce the value of State Fund reserves, he said.

“There’s a lot of issues that could happen that could impact the reserve of the State Fund,” he said. “(The transfer) is just not a good idea.”

Powered by Frankly

© KXLH.com 2018, KXLH.com
All rights reserved
Privacy Policy, | Terms of Service, and Ad Choices

Can't find something?